Due to its basic
indetermination, quantum mechanics is unable to account for meaningful
processes—such as, for example, an anomalous event triggered by an intention,
as in a conscious psi experiment involving an influence (PK) on biological
matter (plants, bacteria…), called bio-PK. And yet we know that meaning is
deeply connected to psi, in the form of an intention (as above), of feelings,
of interconnections with loved ones, etc. This shouldn’t take us backward into discarding
the framework of quantum physics to explain nonlocal consciousness and psi. Due
to the fact that only quantum physics can support the kind of space-time anomalies
shown by psi events, the way backward is blocked. The only possibility is to
move forward, farther into layers where consciousness and energy and matter
must be deeply interconnected to the point of merging or fusing. Indeed, if
meaning cannot be explained at the quantum physics level (of particles), then
we must assume a deeper layer of reality in which mind and matter are so
fundamentally intermingled and fused as to become a single substance:
consciousness-energy. This deep level of reality, the dimension
of consciousness-as-energy, is the semantic
dimension, and syg-energy (semantic energy) is the energy of this
dimension, having the characteristics of both consciousness and very subtle
energy.
The semantic dimension
presents a totally new set of properties pertaining both to consciousness and
energy. It’s at least a 5-D manifold, with one (or more) dimension of
consciousness, one dimension of time, and three dimensions of space (normal
3-D). The semantic dimension is thus as much of a metadimension to space-time
as 3-D is to 2-D.
Thus syg-energy is
organized by consciousness itself; it is steered by meaning and intention or,
more precisely, by the act of creating meaning. This consciousness-energy has
nothing whatsoever to do with energy waves carrying information. Here, the
syg-energy itself is the
embodied meaning.
Hidden
Variables?
At this point, a question
arises: does adding a dimension of deep reality mean endorsing some sort of
hidden variables? The assumption of Albert Einstein, in proposing hidden
variables, was that some hidden causal factors are at work in what appear as
random events at the quantum level, bending them toward specific effects, and
that these factors, presently impossible to assess, could nevertheless be
unraveled one day. Hidden variables were supposed to be sets of causes leading
to deterministic effects. The idea of Einstein, in proposing hidden variables,
was to save the concept of a deterministic universe: “God doesn’t play dice,”
he said against the new and formidable concept of pure indetermination proposed
by Werner Heisenberg, Niels Bohr, and the “orthodox,” or Copenhagen, school of
quantum physics. Physicist David Bohm, in his implicate order theory, is in accordance
with the concept of hidden variables.* This implicate order posits a deeper
layer, annulling space. Bohm, however, saw physical reality (the explicate
order) as totally determined by the implicate order: no free interactions or two-way
influences, but rather a deep level of causes from which the physical reality
itself unfolds in a deterministic way.
Let’s consider the
question anew: does, then, a dimension of deep reality endorse hidden
variables? The answer is no. The deep reality layer, as we will see, is neither
deterministic nor indeterministic. Its reality lies in a novel framework nearer
to synchronistic acausal events proposed by Jung and Pauli than to either of
the two schools of quantum physics (the orthodox posing pure indetermination
and the hidden variables based on a deterministic framework).
———————————————
* David Bohm, Wholeness and the Implicate
Order.
(Read more on this subject in The Sacred Network, chapter 13.)
No comments:
Post a Comment